[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d251879-1cf4-237d-8e62-c42bb4feb047@nbd.name>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 18:35:00 +0100
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/core: add optional threading for backlog
processing
On 24.03.23 18:20, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 18:13:14 +0100 Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> When dealing with few flows or an imbalance on CPU utilization, static RPS
>> CPU assignment can be too inflexible. Add support for enabling threaded NAPI
>> for backlog processing in order to allow the scheduler to better balance
>> processing. This helps better spread the load across idle CPUs.
>
> Can you explain the use case a little bit more?
I'm primarily testing this on routers with 2 or 4 CPUs and limited
processing power, handling routing/NAT. RPS is typically needed to
properly distribute the load across all available CPUs. When there is
only a small number of flows that are pushing a lot of traffic, a static
RPS assignment often leaves some CPUs idle, whereas others become a
bottleneck by being fully loaded. Threaded NAPI reduces this a bit, but
CPUs can become bottlenecked and fully loaded by a NAPI thread alone.
Making backlog processing threaded helps split up the processing work
even more and distribute it onto remaining idle CPUs.
It can basically be used to make RPS a bit more dynamic and
configurable, because you can assign multiple backlog threads to a set
of CPUs and selectively steer packets from specific devices / rx queues
to them and allow the scheduler to take care of the rest.
- Felix
Powered by blists - more mailing lists