[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKEivv6t+v9evOWptt=i4ddte4OmV=o-BNWPm-ZQ9YfdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:07:46 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, cocci@...ia.fr,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Improve exception handling in rbtree_add_and_remove()
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 7:13 AM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:54:18 +0100
>
> The label “err_out” was used to jump to another pointer check despite of
> the detail in the implementation of the function “rbtree_add_and_remove”
> that it was determined already that a corresponding variable contained
> a null pointer.
>
> 1. Thus return directly after the first call of the function
> “bpf_obj_new” failed.
>
> 2. Delete two questionable checks.
>
> 3. Omit an extra initialisation (for the variable “m”)
> which became unnecessary with this refactoring.
>
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Fixes: 215249f6adc0359e3546829e7ee622b5e309b0ad ("selftests/bpf: Add rbtree selftests")
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Nack.
Please stop sending such "cleanup" patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists