[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a6fc4bd-82a1-3200-3061-4634531b5a63@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 11:42:09 +0800
From: "haowenchao (C)" <haowenchao2@...wei.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linfeilong@...wei.com>, <louhongxiang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5]scsi:scsi_debug: Add error injection for single device
On 2023/3/24 0:25, John Garry wrote:
> On 23/03/2023 13:13, haowenchao (C) wrote:
>> On 2023/3/23 20:40, John Garry wrote:
>>> On 23/03/2023 11:55, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>>>> The original error injection mechanism was based on scsi_host which
>>>> could not inject fault for a single SCSI device.
>>>>
>>>> This patchset provides the ability to inject errors for a single
>>>> SCSI device. Now we supports inject timeout errors, queuecommand
>>>> errors, and hostbyte, driverbyte, statusbyte, and sense data for
>>>> specific SCSI Command.
>>>
>>> There is already a basic mechanism to generate errors - like timeouts - on "nth" command. Can you say why you want this new interface? What special scenarios are you trying to test/validate (which could not be achieved based on the current mechanism)?
>>>
>>
>> I am testing a new error handle policy which is based on single scsi_device
>> without set host to RECOVERY. So I need a method to generate errors for
>> single SCSI devices.
>>
>> While we can not generate errors for single device with current mechanism
>> because it is designed for host-wide error generation.
>>
>>> With this series we would have 2x methods to inject errors, which is less than ideal, and they seem to possibly conflict as well, e.g. I set timeout for nth command via current interface and then use the new interface to set timeout for some other cadence. What behavior to expect ...?
>>
>> I did not take this issue in consideration. I now assume the users would
>> not use these 2 methods at same time.
>>
>> What's more, I don not know where to write the usage of this newly added
>> interface, maybe we can explain these in doc?
>
> sysfs entries are described in Documentation/ABI, but please don't add elaborate programming interfaces in sysfs files (like in these patches) - a sysfs file should be just for reading or writing a single value
>
If sysfs is not recommended, what about proc?
>>
>>>
>>> I'm not saying that I am a huge fan of the current inject mechanism, but at the very least you need to provide more justification for this series.
>>>>>
>>>> The first patch add an sysfs interface to add and inquiry single
>>>> device's error injection info; the second patch defined how to remove
>>>> an injection which has been added. The following 3 patches use the
>>>> injection info and generate the related error type.
>>>>
>>>> Wenchao Hao (5):
>>>> scsi:scsi_debug: Add sysfs interface to manage scsi devices' error
>>>> injection
>>>> scsi:scsi_debug: Define grammar to remove added error injection
>>>> scsi:scsi_debug: timeout command if the error is injected
>>>> scsi:scsi_debug: Return failed value if the error is injected
>>>> scsi:scsi_debug: set command's result and sense data if the error is
>>>> injected
>>>>
>>>> drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c | 296 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 296 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists