linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: alc5632: Convert to dtschema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:45:01 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Saalim Quadri <danascape@...il.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        daniel.baluta@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: alc5632: Convert to dtschema

On 23/03/2023 20:17, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 08:08:33PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/03/2023 18:11, Saalim Quadri wrote:
> 
>>> I have a doubt, for the maintainers list, is it required to include all the names of the subsystem maintainer
>>> in the yaml too? As for this codec, there are 4, shall I include the names of all of them or the one to whom the
> 
>> Depends, choose one or two names, maybe the most active.
> 
> Note that the binding should have maintainers for the specific binding,
> not the kernel subsystem.

Yes. That's what I also said in the beginning, but for some reason
Saalim cut this part... and re-added subsystem maintainers.

Best regards,
Krzysztof