linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/19] cpuidle: move to use bus_get_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZB1lyFkeQavXmThE@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:56:40 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/19] cpuidle: move to use bus_get_dev_root()

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 03:27:45PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:06 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Direct access to the struct bus_type dev_root pointer is going away soon
> > so replace that with a call to bus_get_dev_root() instead, which is what
> > it is there for.
> >
> > This allows us to clean up the cpuidle_add_interface() call a bit as it
> > was only called in one place, with the same argument so just put that
> > into the function itself.  Note that cpuidle_remove_interface() should
> > also probably be removed in the future as there are no callers of it for
> > some reason.
> >
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> > Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>

Great, thanks for the quick reviews!

greg k-h