[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230324131257.GD15824@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:12:57 +0100
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] MIPS: Always select ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU for
noncoherent platforms
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 01:24:24PM +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> As now we are telling the necessity of post DMA flush per CPU type,
> there is no need to select ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU on per platform
> bias, just select it unconditionally and we can sort it at runtime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/Kconfig | 9 +--------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists