linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/17] tty: remove MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87h6uamdzw.fsf@esperi.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:16:03 +0000
From:   Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@...cle.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@...cle.com>,
        linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Hitomi Hasegawa <hasegawa-hitomi@...itsu.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] tty: remove MODULE_LICENSE in non-modules

On 24 Mar 2023, Geert Uytterhoeven uttered the following:
> I (still) agree with that, and I saw similar comments from others as well.
> Unfortunately these comments are spread across tens of threads :-(

Ugh. Should I do this sort of thing in one big commit next time? That
would fix that problem, but at the cost of others. Lumping seems to me
to be troublesome because it makes it harder to accept/reject different
bits, but would it be *as* troublesome as this much splitting?

-- 
NULL && (void)