[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230324150219.GA462@Dell2s-9>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 08:02:19 -0700
From: Piyush Malgujar <pmalgujar@...vell.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<jannadurai@...vell.com>, <cchavva@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-cadence: SD6 support
Hi Krzysztof,
Thanks for the review comments.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:53:51AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/02/2023 19:31, Piyush Malgujar wrote:
> > From: Jayanthi Annadurai <jannadurai@...vell.com>
> >
> > Add support for SD6 controller support.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jayanthi Annadurai <jannadurai@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Piyush Malgujar <pmalgujar@...vell.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/cdns,sdhci.yaml | 24 +++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/cdns,sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/cdns,sdhci.yaml
> > index 8b1a0fdcb5e3e2e8b87d8d7678e37f3dad447fc1..0dba17c4f17f82c8ae68e46225ed72418e8361ff 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/cdns,sdhci.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/cdns,sdhci.yaml
> > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> > $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mmc/cdns,sdhci.yaml#
> > $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >
> > -title: Cadence SD/SDIO/eMMC Host Controller (SD4HC)
> > +title: Cadence SD/SDIO/eMMC Host Controller (SD4HC, SD6HC)
> >
> > maintainers:
> > - Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> > @@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ properties:
> > - enum:
> > - microchip,mpfs-sd4hc
> > - socionext,uniphier-sd4hc
> > - - const: cdns,sd4hc
> > + - enum:
> > + - cdns,sd4hc
> > + - cdns,sd6hc
>
> I see here rather random set of changes in each version of this patch.
> This does not really make sense. You are saying that existing (!!!)
> mpfs-sd4hc is compatible with sd6hc. I think you wanted oneOf here, but
> not sure. Can you explain what is your intention? Your commit msg is
> just one line saying the same as subject, so not really helpful.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Yes thank you, it should be oneOf as sd6hc is exclusive. I will correct it in the
next version.
Best Regards,
Piyush
Powered by blists - more mailing lists