[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59100CE6-1A77-4620-81AC-535A6A68A98F@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 11:22:52 -0400
From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm: page_owner: add support for splitting to any
order in split page_owner.
On 24 Mar 2023, at 11:17, Michal Koutný wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 08:48:26PM -0400, Zi Yan <zi.yan@...t.com> wrote:
>> @@ -5746,8 +5746,8 @@ static void *make_alloc_exact(unsigned long addr, unsigned int order,
>> struct page *page = virt_to_page((void *)addr);
>> struct page *last = page + nr;
>>
>> - split_page_owner(page, 1 << order);
>> - split_page_memcg(page, 1 << order);
>> + split_page_owner(page, 1 << order, 1);
>> + split_page_memcg(page, 1 << order, 1);
>
> I think here should be
>
>> + split_page_owner(page, order, 0);
>> + split_page_memcg(page, 1 << order, 1);
>
> because I was wondering why split_page_memcg() doesn't use orders too?
> (E.g. it wouldn't work well if nr % new_new != 0).
Thanks. Good point. I will make both use orders instead in next version.
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (855 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists