linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Revert "regulator: qcom-rpmh: Use PROBE_FORCE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <167967584071.2616913.12432168406057271810.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:37:20 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Revert "regulator: qcom-rpmh:
 Use PROBE_FORCE_SYNCHRONOUS"

On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 06:34:06 -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> This reverts commit 58973046c1bf ("regulator: qcom-rpmh: Use
> PROBE_FORCE_SYNCHRONOUS"). Further digging into the problems that
> prompted the us to switch to synchronous probe showed that the root
> cause was a missing "rootwait" in the kernel command line
> arguments. Let's reinstate asynchronous probe.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Revert "regulator: qcom-rpmh: Use PROBE_FORCE_SYNCHRONOUS"
      commit: ad44ac082fdff7ee57fe125432f7d9d7cb610a23

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark