lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202303251631.oyjkxqNQ-lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Mar 2023 16:37:25 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc:     oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [gustavoars:testing/fsfa3 17/17] include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:44:26:
 error: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'const volatile int[0]'

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git testing/fsfa3
head:   2226ddb6a576f7f89a8a06a3f89b68f5109ded53
commit: 2226ddb6a576f7f89a8a06a3f89b68f5109ded53 [17/17] Makefile: Enable -Wstringop-overflow and -Warray-bounds
config: s390-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230325/202303251631.oyjkxqNQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git/commit/?id=2226ddb6a576f7f89a8a06a3f89b68f5109ded53
        git remote add gustavoars https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git
        git fetch --no-tags gustavoars testing/fsfa3
        git checkout 2226ddb6a576f7f89a8a06a3f89b68f5109ded53
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 olddefconfig
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303251631.oyjkxqNQ-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/rwonce.h:29,
                    from include/linux/compiler.h:247,
                    from include/linux/build_bug.h:5,
                    from include/linux/bits.h:21,
                    from drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_state_monitor.c:17:
   In function 'preempt_count',
       inlined from 't7xx_fsm_append_event' at drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_state_monitor.c:439:43:
>> include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:44:26: error: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'const volatile int[0]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
      44 | #define __READ_ONCE(x)  (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x))
         |                         ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro '__READ_ONCE'
      50 |         __READ_ONCE(x);                                                 \
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h:17:16: note: in expansion of macro 'READ_ONCE'
      17 |         return READ_ONCE(S390_lowcore.preempt_count) & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
         |                ^~~~~~~~~
   In function 'preempt_count',
       inlined from 't7xx_fsm_append_event' at drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_state_monitor.c:439:43:
>> include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:44:26: error: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'const volatile int[0]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
      44 | #define __READ_ONCE(x)  (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x))
         |                         ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro '__READ_ONCE'
      50 |         __READ_ONCE(x);                                                 \
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h:17:16: note: in expansion of macro 'READ_ONCE'
      17 |         return READ_ONCE(S390_lowcore.preempt_count) & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
         |                ^~~~~~~~~
   In function 'preempt_count',
       inlined from 't7xx_fsm_append_event' at drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_state_monitor.c:439:43:
>> include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:44:26: error: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'const volatile int[0]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
      44 | #define __READ_ONCE(x)  (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x))
         |                         ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro '__READ_ONCE'
      50 |         __READ_ONCE(x);                                                 \
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h:17:16: note: in expansion of macro 'READ_ONCE'
      17 |         return READ_ONCE(S390_lowcore.preempt_count) & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
         |                ^~~~~~~~~
   cc1: all warnings being treated as errors


vim +44 include/asm-generic/rwonce.h

e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  28  
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  29  /*
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  30   * Yes, this permits 64-bit accesses on 32-bit architectures. These will
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  31   * actually be atomic in some cases (namely Armv7 + LPAE), but for others we
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  32   * rely on the access being split into 2x32-bit accesses for a 32-bit quantity
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  33   * (e.g. a virtual address) and a strong prevailing wind.
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  34   */
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  35  #define compiletime_assert_rwonce_type(t)					\
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  36  	compiletime_assert(__native_word(t) || sizeof(t) == sizeof(long long),	\
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  37  		"Unsupported access size for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE().")
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  38  
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  39  /*
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  40   * Use __READ_ONCE() instead of READ_ONCE() if you do not require any
3c9184109e78ea2 Will Deacon 2019-10-30  41   * atomicity. Note that this may result in tears!
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  42   */
b78b331a3f5c077 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  43  #ifndef __READ_ONCE
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15 @44  #define __READ_ONCE(x)	(*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x))
b78b331a3f5c077 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  45  #endif
e506ea451254ab1 Will Deacon 2019-10-15  46  

:::::: The code at line 44 was first introduced by commit
:::::: e506ea451254ab17e0bf918ca36232fec2a9b10c compiler.h: Split {READ,WRITE}_ONCE definitions out into rwonce.h

:::::: TO: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
:::::: CC: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ