[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230325154516.7995-6-w@1wt.eu>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 16:45:13 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: linux@...ssschuh.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] tools/nolibc: tests: fold in no-stack-protector cflags
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
For the cflags to enable stack protectors to work properly they need to
be specified after -fno-stack-protector.
To do this fold all cflags into a single variable and move
-fno-stack-protector before the arch-specific cflags and another
one specific to stack protectors since we don't want to enable them
on all archs.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
index c99bbcda7495..4469dcb0c9d7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
@@ -77,8 +77,9 @@ Q=@
endif
CFLAGS_s390 = -m64
-CFLAGS ?= -Os -fno-ident -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables $(CFLAGS_$(ARCH))
-CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fno-stack-protector)
+CFLAGS ?= -Os -fno-ident -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables \
+ $(call cc-option,-fno-stack-protector) \
+ $(CFLAGS_STKP_$(ARCH)) $(CFLAGS_$(ARCH))
LDFLAGS := -s
help:
--
2.17.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists