[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mt3z7pm5.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 12:50:58 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...nel.org>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 08/13] bpf: Alloc and free bpf_map id in
bpf namespace
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> writes:
> We only expose the bpf map id under current bpf namespace to user. The
> map->id is still the id in the init bpf namespace.
>
> The result as follows,
>
> Run bpftool in a new bpf namespace
> $ bpftool map show
> 4: array name kprobe_b.rodata flags 0x80
> key 4B value 37B max_entries 1 memlock 360B
> btf_id 159 frozen
The btf_id is identical for all the different objects in this example
output; surely that can't be right? Copy-paste error? Same thing in the
other patches...
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists