linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused pHalData variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZCA+vIjUFHZFUFPC@nam-dell>
Date:   Sun, 26 Mar 2023 14:46:52 +0200
From:   Nam Cao <namcaov@...il.com>
To:     Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, nathan@...nel.org,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com, artur.bujdoso@...il.com,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused pHalData variable

On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 08:23:21AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> clang with W=1 reports
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c:1182:23: error: variable
>   'pHalData' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>         struct hal_com_data *pHalData;
>                              ^
> This variable is not used so remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
> index e36f8c369a04..0cb2adcc1f78 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_btcoex.c
> @@ -1179,10 +1179,6 @@ bool hal_btcoex_IsBtDisabled(struct adapter *padapter)
>  
>  void hal_btcoex_SetChipType(struct adapter *padapter, u8 chipType)
>  {
> -	struct hal_com_data *pHalData;
> -
> -
> -	pHalData = GET_HAL_DATA(padapter);
>  }

If this function doesn't do anything, does it not make more sense to
just remove this function entirely?

Best regards,
Nam