linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: clock: update rk3588 clock definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <717bfba9-1d70-ef09-9193-853a57117926@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 26 Mar 2023 19:23:00 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Shane Francis <bigbeeshane@...il.com>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        heiko@...ech.de, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: clock: update rk3588 clock definitions

On 26/03/2023 18:59, Shane Francis wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof
> 
> 
>> So mention this in the commit msg.
> 
>> Then commit msg should also mention it.
> 
> Sorry for not expanding on this more in the initial commit message, I will
> expand on this in the next patch set.
> 
> However I think in general for most modern platforms it can be assumed
> that replacing the bootloader is not always something that is achievable
> for one reason or another

Bootloader also does not use mainline DTS, so where is exactly the problem?

Best regards,
Krzysztof