[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230326045327.GE3269998@google.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 13:53:27 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v7 2/4] mm/zswap: skip invalid or unchanged
parameter
On (23/03/26 12:17), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (23/03/25 15:14), Liu Shixin wrote:
> > static int zswap_enabled_param_set(const char *val,
> > const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > {
> > + bool res;
> > +
> > + if (kstrtobool(val, &res))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + /* no change required */
> > + if (res == *(bool *)kp->arg)
> > + return 0;
>
> Bool kernel param can be any of these letters 'YyTt1NnFf0'. Doing things
> to kp->arg outside of kernel/params.c is not going to be easy, let's not
> even try.
Please disregard my previous email. kp->arg is always true or false
at this point. I'd still prefer to not do kp->arg in zswap.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists