[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfc7fd9f-67cf-3140-0ec5-a240a45506b9@loongson.cn>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 11:58:57 +0800
From: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>
To: loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/5] irqchip/loongson-eiointc: Fix returned value on
parsing MADT
On 2023/3/24 下午11:36, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 06:08:50 +0000,
> Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>>
>> In pch_pic_parse_madt(), a NULL parent pointer will be
>> returned from acpi_get_vec_parent() for second pch-pic domain
>> related to second bridge while calling eiointc_acpi_init() at
>> first time, where the parent of it has not been initialized
>> yet, and will be initialized during second time calling
>> eiointc_acpi_init(). So, it's reasonable to return zero so
>> that failure of acpi_table_parse_madt() will be avoided, or else
>> acpi_cascade_irqdomain_init() will return and initialization of
>> followed pch_msi domain will be skipped.
>>
>> Although it does not matter when pch_msi_parse_madt() returns
>> -EINVAL if no invalid parent is found, it's also reasonable to
>> return zero for that.
>>
>> Change-Id: I4d278534999ec3e5c8db6d40155ba2665d9de86f
>> Signed-off-by: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c
>> index d15fd38c1756..62a632d73991 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c
>> @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static int __init pch_pic_parse_madt(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
>> if (parent)
>> return pch_pic_acpi_init(parent, pchpic_entry);
>>
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + return 0;
>
> Why can't you detect this particular case instead of blindly
> suppressing the error?
>
For dual-bridges scenario, parent handle for pch_pic IRQ domain will be
set by acpi_set_vec_parent() during each eiointc initialization. And
the parent handle for one pch_pic will be set during *first* eiointc
entry parsing, and the parent handle for another pch_pic will be
set during *second* eiointc entry parsing. But two pch_pic entries
will be parsed during each eiointc entry parsing, so a NULL parent
pointer must be returned druing first eiointc initialization, which
is reasonable and should not be treated as an error.
The calling stack of pch_pic_parse_madt (where acpi_get_vec_parent is
called to get parent handle) is like this:
cpuintc_acpi_init
acpi_cascade_irqdomain_init(in cpuintc driver)
acpi_table_parse_madt
eiointc_parse_madt
eiointc_acpi_init /* this will be called two times
corresponding to parsing two eiointc entries in MADT under dual-bridges
scenario*/
acpi_set_vec_parent /* set parent handle for one pch_pic
during first eiointc entry parsing, and set parent handle for another
pch_pic during second eiointc entry parsing*/
acpi_cascade_irqdomain_init(in eiointc driver)
acpi_table_parse_madt
pch_pic_parse_madt /* this will be called twice because
of two pchpic entries, and only one valid parent handle will be returned
from acpi_get_vec_parent() during first eiointc entry parsing (another
parent handle is not set yet), so a NULL parent pointer must be returned
during first eiointc entry parsing, which is reasonable and should not
be treated as an error.*/
Thanks!
> M.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists