lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87cz4unrdp.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:30:42 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> To: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>, Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Kai Wasserbäch <kai@....carbon-project.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: process: allow Closes tags with links Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info> writes: >> If we do that, would it be blocking to have this included in v6.3? > > You mean if this still can go in for 6.3? Well, the patches afaics needs > to be ACKed by the right people first (Joe for checkpatch I guess, Jon > for docs). It likely also depends on how this discussion continues and > the opinion of the maintainer(s?) that picks up the patches. We're at -rc4, I wouldn't really consider this for 6.3 at this point. There's no reason to try to rush it. Thanks, jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists