[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cz4unrdp.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:30:42 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Kai Wasserbäch <kai@....carbon-project.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: process: allow Closes tags with links
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info> writes:
>> If we do that, would it be blocking to have this included in v6.3?
>
> You mean if this still can go in for 6.3? Well, the patches afaics needs
> to be ACKed by the right people first (Joe for checkpatch I guess, Jon
> for docs). It likely also depends on how this discussion continues and
> the opinion of the maintainer(s?) that picks up the patches.
We're at -rc4, I wouldn't really consider this for 6.3 at this point.
There's no reason to try to rush it.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists