[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZCHWtptOwPPtUe+u@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:47:34 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Viktor Malik <vmalik@...hat.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] kallsyms: move module-related functions under
correct configs
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 06:12:51PM +0200, Viktor Malik wrote:
> Functions for searching module kallsyms should have non-empty
> definitions only if CONFIG_MODULES=y and CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y. Until now,
> only CONFIG_MODULES check was used for many of these, which may have
> caused complilation errors on some configs.
>
> This patch moves all relevant functions under the correct configs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@...hat.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303181535.RFDCnz3E-lkp@intel.com/
Thanks Viktor! Does this fix something from an existing commit? If so
which one? The commit log should mention it.
LUis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists