linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/14] Control Quad SPI pinctrl better on Qualcomm Chromebooks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2023 23:44:52 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Rajesh Patil <rajpat@...eaurora.org>,
        Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Control Quad SPI pinctrl better on Qualcomm Chromebooks

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 6:31 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:

> The main goal of this series is to do a better job of cI can apply ontroling the
> pins related to the "Quad SPI" IP block on Qualcomm Chromebooks. This
> is essentially 'v2' of my previous attempt in the patch ("arm64: dts:
> qcom: sc7180: Fix trogdor qspi pull direction") [1] but since it's
> spiraled out a bit and there are no patches that are exactly the same
> I've reset to v1.
>
> The early patches in this series are just no-op cleanup patches that
> can be applied. They're not terribly critical but since they are
> "Fixes" I've listed them first.
>
> The next patch in the series is a very simple and (hopefully)
> non-controversial SPI patch. It can be applied independently if
> anything else.
>
> Next, we have a bunch of pinctrl patches (including the device tree
> bindings related to them). I dunno what folks are going to think about
> these. If everyone hates them, we can drop them and just change the
> later patches in the series to use "input-enable" instead of
> "output-disable". It feels ugly to me, but it maybe less upheval.
>
> Next I removed the now-deprecated "input-enable" property from all
> Chromebooks. None of them were necessary.
>
> Finally, I did what I really wanted to do in the first place: attempt
> to cleanup the pinctrl states of the Quad SPI. These patches have a
> hard requirement on the pinctrl change.

This looks good to me (TM)

Do you have a merge plan?
I can queue the pinctrl patch into the pinctrl tree, and
the pinctrl binding patches.

Will you take the rest to the SPI and SoC tree?

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
FWIW

Yours,
Linus Walleij