[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230327175059.1e8584cc@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:50:59 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
"quic_neeraju@...cinc.com" <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...y.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Reduce synchronize_rcu() waiting time
On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:48:44 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> struct my_info {
> /* store state info here */
> };
>
> int main(...) {
> struct tracecmd_input *handle;
> struct my_info info;
> char *file = argv[1];
>
> handle = tracecmd_open(file);
>
> tracecmd_follow_event(handle, "rcu", "rcu_batch_start",
> batch_start, &info);
>
> tracecmd_follow_event(handle, "rcu", "rcu_batch_end",
> batch_end, &info);
>
> tracecmd_follow_event(handle, "rcu", "rcu_invoke_callback",
> invoke_callback, &info);
>
> tracecmd_iterate_events(handle, NULL, 0, NULL, NULL);
>
> tracecmd_close(handle);
> }
BTW, none of this code was actually tested, so I may have some syntax
errors. I just did this straight from memory, as it's so easy ;-)
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists