[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40e61776-bcdd-25ac-286a-1ba0184dbd7e@undef.tools>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 20:15:46 +1100
From: Jarrah <kernel@...ef.tools>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Robert Mader <robert.mader@...labora.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com>,
Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>, Martijn Braam <martijn@...xit.nl>,
Kamil Trzciński <ayufan@...fan.eu>,
Caleb Connolly <kc@...tmarketos.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Tom Fitzhenry <tom@...-fitzhenry.me.uk>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rk3399-pinephone-pro: Add internal display
support
On 3/27/23 20:11, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Montag, 27. März 2023, 09:55:15 CEST schrieb Jarrah:
>> Hi Javier,
>>
>> On 3/27/23 18:41, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> From: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
>>>
>>> The phone's display is using a Hannstar LCD panel. Support it by adding a
>>> panel DT node and all needed nodes (backlight, MIPI DSI, regulators, etc).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
>>> Co-developed-by: Martijn Braam <martijn@...xit.nl>
>>> Co-developed-by: Kamil Trzciński <ayufan@...fan.eu>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Drop touchscreen node because used the wrong compatible (Ondrej Jirman).
>>
>> Any reason not to include this with the correct compatible string? It's
>> been available since
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220813043821.9981-1-kernel@undef.tools/.
>> Swapping out gt917s for gt1158 in the node from your previous patch
>> should be enough.
> Just wondering if I'm blind, Javier's patch doesn't contain any touchscreen
> controller (haven't found neither gt9* or gt11* mentioned there), so
> I'm inclined to go with the "touchscreen can be added later" thing.
I was just commenting on the "Changes in v2" section. v1 had a
touchscreen node in it (assuming I found the right v1).
All good, I can follow up with a patch for the touchscreen.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists