[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a989f01e-79a9-44a4-3603-ba4eeeb86dea@linbit.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 14:28:37 +0200
From: Christoph Böhmwalder
<christoph.boehmwalder@...bit.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: cocci@...ia.fr, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resent] drbd: Fix exception handling in
nla_put_drbd_cfg_context()
Am 25.03.23 um 15:07 schrieb Markus Elfring:
> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 18:32:05 +0100
>
> The label “nla_put_failure” was used to jump to another pointer check
> despite of the detail in the implementation of the function
> “nla_put_drbd_cfg_context” that it was determined already that
> the corresponding variable contained a null pointer.
>
> * Thus return directly after a call of the function
> “nla_nest_start_noflag” failed.
>
> * Delete an extra pointer check which became unnecessary
> with this refactoring.
>
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Fixes: 543cc10b4cc5c60aa9fcc62705ccfb9998bf4697 ("drbd: drbd_adm_get_status needs to show some more detail")
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
> index f49f2a5282e1..9cb947127472 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
> @@ -3187,7 +3187,7 @@ static int nla_put_drbd_cfg_context(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct nlattr *nla;
> nla = nla_nest_start_noflag(skb, DRBD_NLA_CFG_CONTEXT);
> if (!nla)
> - goto nla_put_failure;
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> if (device &&
> nla_put_u32(skb, T_ctx_volume, device->vnr))
> goto nla_put_failure;
> @@ -3205,8 +3205,7 @@ static int nla_put_drbd_cfg_context(struct sk_buff *skb,
> return 0;
>
> nla_put_failure:
> - if (nla)
> - nla_nest_cancel(skb, nla);
> + nla_nest_cancel(skb, nla);
> return -EMSGSIZE;
> }
>
> --
> 2.40.0
>
Sorry, I fail to see how this is an improvement over the status quo,
much less a "fix".
Can you identify the issue with the current code and can you explain how
your patch makes it better?
--
Christoph Böhmwalder
LINBIT | Keeping the Digital World Running
DRBD HA — Disaster Recovery — Software defined Storage
Powered by blists - more mailing lists