linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] md/raid5: remove unused working

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230327132324.1769595-1-trix@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:23:24 -0400
From:   Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To:     song@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] md/raid5: remove unused working_disks variable

clang with W=1 reports
drivers/md/raid5.c:7719:6: error: variable 'working_disks'
  set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
        int working_disks = 0;
            ^
This variable is not used so remove it.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
---
v2: remove brances
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 7b820b81d8c2..812a12e3e41a 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -7716,7 +7716,6 @@ static void raid5_set_io_opt(struct r5conf *conf)
 static int raid5_run(struct mddev *mddev)
 {
 	struct r5conf *conf;
-	int working_disks = 0;
 	int dirty_parity_disks = 0;
 	struct md_rdev *rdev;
 	struct md_rdev *journal_dev = NULL;
@@ -7912,10 +7911,8 @@ static int raid5_run(struct mddev *mddev)
 			pr_warn("md: cannot handle concurrent replacement and reshape.\n");
 			goto abort;
 		}
-		if (test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)) {
-			working_disks++;
+		if (test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags))
 			continue;
-		}
 		/* This disc is not fully in-sync.  However if it
 		 * just stored parity (beyond the recovery_offset),
 		 * when we don't need to be concerned about the
-- 
2.27.0