[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZCGv18wnEtoFvtfM@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:01:43 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Brian Cain <bcain@...cinc.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-oxnas@...ups.io,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-openrisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/21] ARM: dma-mapping: split out arch_dma_mark_clean()
helper
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 02:13:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> The arm version of the arch_sync_dma_for_cpu() function annotates pages as
> PG_dcache_clean after a DMA, but no other architecture does this here.
... because this is an arm32 specific feature. Generically, it's
PG_arch_1, which is a page flag free for architecture use. On arm32
we decided to use this to mark whether we can skip dcache writebacks
when establishing a PTE - and thus it was decided to call it
PG_dcache_clean to reflect how arm32 decided to use that bit.
This isn't just a DMA thing, there are other places that we update
the bit, such as flush_dcache_page() and copy_user_highpage().
So thinking that the arm32 PG_dcache_clean is something for DMA is
actually wrong.
Other architectures are free to do their own other optimisations
using that bit, and their implementations may be DMA-centric.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists