[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de82d0ff-3e2f-4822-8430-13e2b1633b3a@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 16:48:02 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
linux-imx@....com, stefan@...er.ch, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: update gpio-ranges
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 01:29:12PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> 1 is not enough for i.MX9, enlarge it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml | 3 ++-
I'm not that knowledgeable about i.MX9, but i thought vf610 was
Vybrid, which is not an i.MX9. Does i.MX9 reuse the Vybrid GPIO
controller? Is this change also valid for the Vybrid?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists