[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALvZod4boccrKxrCm9aDBCupror1zC0J3spHeidSiAZgei_r9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:20:15 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Vasily Averin <vasily.averin@...ux.dev>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 9/9] memcg: do not modify rstat tree for zero updates
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 11:17 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> In some situations, we may end up calling memcg_rstat_updated() with a
> value of 0, which means the stat was not actually updated. An example is
> if we fail to reclaim any pages in shrink_folio_list().
>
> Do not add the cgroup to the rstat updated tree in this case, to avoid
> unnecessarily flushing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists