[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MN2PR03MB51688CAF5DDF0628ED6B0B06E7889@MN2PR03MB5168.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 16:01:21 +0000
From: "Sahin, Okan" <Okan.Sahin@...log.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
"Bolboaca, Ramona" <Ramona.Bolboaca@...log.com>,
ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
"Tilki, Ibrahim" <Ibrahim.Tilki@...log.com>,
William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@...htek.com>,
Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 5/5] mfd: max77541: Add ADI MAX77541/MAX77540 PMIC
Support
>On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:51:18PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
>> On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 17:35 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
>> > > On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 14:46 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > IIRC, regmap_read() is not really reentrant and it is used in
>> > > > > the IIO driver on the sysfs interface. So, yeah, I think you
>> > > > > need the regmap lock and better just leave the config as is.
>> > > > > Yes, the lock is
>> > > > > opt-
>> > > > > out
>> > > > > so let's not disable it :)
>> > > >
>> > > > All the regmap operations are fully thread safe.
>> > >
>> > > Even if 'config->disable_locking' is set? I think that is what's
>> > > being discussed in here...
>> >
>> > In case the driver has its own lock to serialize IO how on earth the
>> > regmap lock is needed. That's what I asked the author of the driver.
>> > He told the code
>>
>> Well, if the driver has it's own locking, then sure we do not need
>> regmap's lock...
>>
>> > doesn't require the regmap lock, and I tend to believe the author.
>> > So, why to
>> > keep it?
>>
>> However, if you look at the adc driver, I can see plain regmap_read()
>> calls without any "outside" locking.
>
>Then author of the code should know what they are doing. Right?
>
>--
>With Best Regards,
>Andy Shevchenko
>
Hi Andy,
Actually, I do not want to disable regmap lock that's why I did not update it.
Regards,
Okan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists