[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4fd06223-e307-50e6-f4ec-40ca34fc1a4b@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 11:38:03 -0500
From: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the rdma tree
On 3/27/23 20:16, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> FIXME: Add owner of second tree to To:
> Add author(s)/SOB of conflicting commits.
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 5bf944f24129 ("RDMA/rxe: Add error messages")
>
> from the rdma tree and commit:
>
> 330f72b82ab0 ("RDMA/rxe: Rename kfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()")
>
> from the rcu tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the code modified by the latter was moved by the former,
> so I used this files from the former and applied the following merge fix
> patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
> linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
> to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
> You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
> conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:12:24 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fixup for "RDMA/rxe: Add error messages"
>
> interacting with "RDMA/rxe: Rename kfree_rcu() to kvfree_rcu_mightsleep()"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c
> index 84b53c070fc5..bbdfbff5c752 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c
> @@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ static int rxe_dereg_mr(struct ib_mr *ibmr, struct ib_udata *udata)
> if (cleanup_err)
> rxe_err_mr(mr, "cleanup failed, err = %d", cleanup_err);
>
> - kfree_rcu(mr);
> + kfree(mr);
> return 0;
>
> err_out:
Thanks, I thought we had already done this. If not then we should. This is the correct fix
for that rcu mightsleep business.
Reviewed-by: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists