[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKxcqDO3-LyuroUkFUfG2dtZOLE4n2UJQ3y-ft5BRm30g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 19:54:13 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
john.carr@...outed.co.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ipv6: add option to explicitly enable reachability test
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 5:39 PM Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch> wrote:
>
> Systems which act as host as well as router might prefer the host
> behavior. Currently the kernel does not allow to use IPv6 forwarding
> globally and at the same time use route reachability probing.
>
> Add a compile time flag to enable route reachability probe in any
> case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> ---
> My use case is a OpenThread device which at the same time can also act as a
> client communicating with Thread devices. Thread Border routers use the Route
> Information mechanism to publish routes with a lifetime of up to 1800s. If
> one of the Thread Border router goes offline, the lack of reachability probing
> currenlty leads to outages of up to 30 minutes.
>
> Not sure if the chosen method is acceptable. Maybe a runtime flag is preferred?
I guess so. Because distros would have to choose a compile option.
Not a new sysfs, only an IFLA_INET6_REACHABILITY_PROBE ?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists