linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] objtool: Combine '--backtrace' with '--verbose'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:19:21 -0700
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] objtool: Combine '--backtrace' with '--verbose'

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:07:43AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 09:00:45AM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Get rid of the '--backtrace' option, instead including that
> > functionality in '--verbose'.  This makes it easy to gather all the
> > information needed for diagnosing objtool warnings.
> 
> Hurmm.. can't we have verbose imply backtrace but keep the separate
> option? I'm not sure if I always want the objdump thing -- esp with
> multiple warnings on vmlinux that's going to be really slow -- better to
> dump the whole of vmlinux.o once at the end.

That's a good point, vmlinux would be unbearable for multiple warnings.

We could accumulate a list of affected functions and then supply that to
objdump-func.sh at the end and dump them all at the same time.

objdump-func.sh would need to be changed to look for multiple funcs at
once.

If I do that, do you still want the separate backtrace option?

-- 
Josh