[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230328221644.803272-6-yosryahmed@google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 22:16:40 +0000
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc: Vasily Averin <vasily.averin@...ux.dev>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/9] memcg: replace stats_flush_lock with an atomic
As Johannes notes in [1], stats_flush_lock is currently used to:
(a) Protect updated to stats_flush_threshold.
(b) Protect updates to flush_next_time.
(c) Serializes calls to cgroup_rstat_flush() based on those ratelimits.
However:
1. stats_flush_threshold is already an atomic
2. flush_next_time is not atomic. The writer is locked, but the reader
is lockless. If the reader races with a flush, you could see this:
if (time_after(jiffies, flush_next_time))
spin_trylock()
flush_next_time = now + delay
flush()
spin_unlock()
spin_trylock()
flush_next_time = now + delay
flush()
spin_unlock()
which means we already can get flushes at a higher frequency than
FLUSH_TIME during races. But it isn't really a problem.
The reader could also see garbled partial updates, so it needs at
least READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE protection.
3. Serializing cgroup_rstat_flush() calls against the ratelimit
factors is currently broken because of the race in 2. But the race
is actually harmless, all we might get is the occasional earlier
flush. If there is no delta, the flush won't do much. And if there
is, the flush is justified.
So the lock can be removed all together. However, the lock also served
the purpose of preventing a thundering herd problem for concurrent
flushers, see [2]. Use an atomic instead to serve the purpose of
unifying concurrent flushers.
[1]https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230323172732.GE739026@cmpxchg.org/
[2]https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210716212137.1391164-2-shakeelb@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index ff39f78f962e..65750f8b8259 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -585,8 +585,8 @@ mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *mctz)
*/
static void flush_memcg_stats_dwork(struct work_struct *w);
static DECLARE_DEFERRABLE_WORK(stats_flush_dwork, flush_memcg_stats_dwork);
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(stats_flush_lock);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, stats_updates);
+static atomic_t stats_flush_ongoing = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
static atomic_t stats_flush_threshold = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
static u64 flush_next_time;
@@ -636,15 +636,19 @@ static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val)
static void __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(void)
{
- unsigned long flag;
-
- if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&stats_flush_lock, flag))
+ /*
+ * We always flush the entire tree, so concurrent flushers can just
+ * skip. This avoids a thundering herd problem on the rstat global lock
+ * from memcg flushers (e.g. reclaim, refault, etc).
+ */
+ if (atomic_read(&stats_flush_ongoing) ||
+ atomic_xchg(&stats_flush_ongoing, 1))
return;
- flush_next_time = jiffies_64 + 2*FLUSH_TIME;
+ WRITE_ONCE(flush_next_time, jiffies_64 + 2*FLUSH_TIME);
cgroup_rstat_flush_atomic(root_mem_cgroup->css.cgroup);
atomic_set(&stats_flush_threshold, 0);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stats_flush_lock, flag);
+ atomic_set(&stats_flush_ongoing, 0);
}
void mem_cgroup_flush_stats(void)
@@ -655,7 +659,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_flush_stats(void)
void mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited(void)
{
- if (time_after64(jiffies_64, flush_next_time))
+ if (time_after64(jiffies_64, READ_ONCE(flush_next_time)))
mem_cgroup_flush_stats();
}
--
2.40.0.348.gf938b09366-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists