[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1CBD903C-C417-42F4-9515-551041BF6CEF@joshtriplett.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:00:30 +0900
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] do_open(): Fix O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT behavior
On March 28, 2023 12:32:59 PM GMT+09:00, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>Ok, just to play along - maybe you can make it slightly less
>nonsensical by throwing O_PATH into the mix, and now an empty
>directory file descriptor at least has *some* use.
That's the case I was thinking of: create a directory, then use exclusively *at system calls, never anything path-based. (I was using "atomic" loosely; not concerned about races here, just convenience.)
>Now your code would not only be specific to Linux, it would be
>specific to some very new version of Linux, and do something
>completely different on older versions.
I'm extremely not concerned with depending on current Linux. But that said...
>Because those older versions will do random things, ranging from
>"always return an error" to "create a regular file - not a directory -
>and then return an error anyway" and finally "create a regular file -
>not a directory - and return that resulting fd".
... Right, open has the un-extendable semantics, hence O_TMPFILE. Fair enough. Nevermind then.
As is often the case for multi-operation syscalls, I'm better off just using io_uring for a mkdir-then-open.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists