lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230328012231.GB21977@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2023 03:22:31 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [regression] Bug 217218 - Trying to boot Linux version 6-2.2
 kernel with Marvell SATA controller 88SE9235


I finally found some real time to look into this:

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 02:52:00PM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> > The man errors I am getting are
> > 
> > dmar_fault 8 callbacks suppressed
> > DMAR : DRHD: handling fault status req 2
> > DMAR : [DMA Write NO_PASID] Request device [07.00.1] fault addr
> > 0xfffe0000 [fault reason 0x82] Present bit in contect entry is clear

This clearly indicates that my original idea about the AMD gart was
completely bonkers, as we're obviously on an Intel platform.

And this indicates that the device is trying to do a DMA write to
something that isn't IOMMU mapped.  Getting this from an initialization
change (commit 78013eaadf6 (x86: remove the IOMMU table infrastructure")
feels very strange to me.

Can you maybe post the full dmesg?  I wonder if there is interesting
initialization error in here.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ