linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Use dma_default_coherent for devicetree default coherency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230328074511.GA6188@alpha.franken.de>
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:45:11 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Use dma_default_coherent for devicetree default
 coherency

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 03:18:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:17:38AM +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> > > 
> > > Is patch a 6.3 candidate or should all of it go into 6.4?
> > 
> > Please leave it for 6.4, as corresponding MIPS arch part will be a part of 6.4.
> 
> Ok.  I'll really need review from the MIPS and drivers/of/ maintainers,
> through.

I don't see any MIPS changes in the series besides the ifdef CONFIG_MIPS
part in patch 1, which gets removed again in patch 4 (chance to drop
that completely ?).

I've merged the corresponding MIPS patches into mips-next last week.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]