[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZCK3fGkgowvAd6Dw@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 11:46:36 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mathias.nyman@...el.com,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] usb: dwc3: qcom: Allow runtime PM
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 10:22:17PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> dwc3-qcom driver is capable of doing runtime PM on its own, but currently
> it requires userspace intervention to enable it. But there is no harm in
> letting the driver to enable runtime PM on its own. So let's get rid of the
> "pm_runtime_forbid()" and make sure that the dependency is maintained with
> child devices using "pm_suspend_ignore_children(dev, false)".
Well, the potential harm is that these paths have hardly been tested so
enabling it by default is a risk (e.g. as you noticed when trying to
enable this by default). And especially if we don't address the layering
violations first.
> Also during remove(), the device needs to be waken up first if it was
> runtime suspended. Finally, pm_runtime_allow() can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c
> index f1059dfcb0e8..5f26bb66274f 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c
> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> qcom->is_suspended = false;
> pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> - pm_runtime_forbid(dev);
> + pm_suspend_ignore_children(dev, false);
There's no need to explicitly disable ignore-children as that is the
default.
> return 0;
>
> @@ -948,6 +948,8 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> int i;
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
This call needs to be balanced. But this is a fix for a bug in the
current implementation that should go in a separate patch.
> +
> device_remove_software_node(&qcom->dwc3->dev);
> of_platform_depopulate(dev);
>
> @@ -960,7 +962,6 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dwc3_qcom_interconnect_exit(qcom);
> reset_control_assert(qcom->resets);
>
> - pm_runtime_allow(dev);
> pm_runtime_disable(dev);
>
> return 0;
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists