lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2023 19:03:34 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@...il.com>,
        Richard van Schagen <richard@...terhints.com>,
        Richard van Schagen <vschagen@...com>,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
        erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/7] net: dsa: mt7530: set both CPU port interfaces
 to PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA

On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:57:57 +0300 Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> I don't appreciate your consistent use of the word "abuse" on my 
> patches. I'm by no means a senior C programmer. I'm doing my best to 
> correct the driver.
> 
> Thank you for explaining the process of phylink with DSA, I will adjust 
> my patches accordingly.
> 
> I suggest you don't take my patches seriously for a while, until I know 
> better.

Maybe my bad, I should have sent you a note on your previous series
already. The patches may be fine, but the commit messages need to do
a better job of describing what the goal of the change is, functionally.

For fixes the bar is even higher because, as Vladimir points out,
commit messages for fixes need to explain what user visible problem 
the patch is resolving. Think of it as a letter to a person using the
switch who hits a problem and wants to look thru the upstream commits
to see if it's already fixed.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ