[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230328124721.f65amn4v5qmdg64g@bogus>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:47:21 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, pierre.gondois@....com,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, palmer@...osinc.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, prime.zeng@...ilicon.com,
linuxarm@...wei.com, yangyicong@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cacheinfo: Fix LLC is not exported through sysfs
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 07:49:15PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
>
> After entering 6.3-rc1 the LLC cacheinfo is not exported on our ACPI
I would have preferred the commit causing the issue as you know and have
it in the fixes tag, but info is there so I don't think it is worth another
version churn. Sorry my bad for missing it earlier.
> based arm64 server. This is because the LLC cacheinfo is partly reset
> when secondary CPUs boot up. On arm64 the primary cpu will allocate
> and setup cacheinfo:
> init_cpu_topology()
> for_each_possible_cpu()
> fetch_cache_info() // Allocate cacheinfo and init levels
> detect_cache_attributes()
> cache_shared_cpu_map_setup()
> if (!last_level_cache_is_valid()) // not valid, setup LLC
> cache_setup_properties() // setup LLC
>
> On secondary CPU boot up:
> detect_cache_attributes()
> populate_cache_leaves()
> get_cache_type() // Get cache type from clidr_el1,
> // for LLC type=CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE
> cache_shared_cpu_map_setup()
> if (!last_level_cache_is_valid()) // Valid and won't go to this branch,
> // leave LLC's type=CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE
>
> The last_level_cache_is_valid() use cacheinfo->{attributes, fw_token} to
> test it's valid or not, but populate_cache_leaves() will only reset
> LLC's type, so we won't try to re-setup LLC's type and leave it
> CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE and won't export it through sysfs.
>
> This patch tries to fix this by not re-populating the cache leaves if
> the LLC is valid.
>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Hi Greg,
Can you pick this up in your next round of fixes for v6.3 please ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists