[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CRI1AQ7OIF6F.2G26C7VQKL5P0@burritosblues>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:01:05 +0200
From: "Esteban Blanc" <eblanc@...libre.com>
To: "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>, <jpanis@...libre.com>,
<jneanne@...libre.com>, <sterzik@...com>, <u-kumar1@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] rtc: tps6594: add driver for TPS6594 PMIC RTC
On Tue Mar 28, 2023 at 11:29 AM CEST, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 28/03/2023 11:14:46+0200, Esteban Blanc wrote:
> > + /* Start rtc */
> > + ret = regmap_set_bits(tps->regmap, TPS6594_REG_RTC_CTRL_1,
> > + TPS6594_BIT_STOP_RTC);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + mdelay(100);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * RTC should be running now. Check if this is the case.
> > + * If not it might be a missing oscillator.
> > + */
> > + ret = regmap_test_bits(tps->regmap, TPS6594_REG_RTC_STATUS,
> > + TPS6594_BIT_RUN);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + if (ret == 0)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + /* Stop RTC until first call to `tps6594_rtc_set_time */
> > + ret = regmap_clear_bits(tps->regmap, TPS6594_REG_RTC_CTRL_1,
> > + TPS6594_BIT_STOP_RTC);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
>
> This whole block must not be executed when the RTC is already running,
> else, you are stopping a perfectly running RTC.
I'm not sure to get your point. You mean that during probe, the driver
might encounter an RTC device that is already running with a correct
timestamp? How would this be possible? A previous bootstage or the
driver was removed then re-inserted again?
Thanks for your time,
--
Esteban Blanc
BayLibre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists