[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230328160027.21b5b340@xps-13>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 16:00:27 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Bang Li <libang.linuxer@...il.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtdblock: tolerate corrected bit-flips
Hi Richard,
richard@....at wrote on Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:21:50 +0200 (CEST):
> Hi!
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > libang.linuxer@...il.com wrote on Thu, 23 Mar 2023 22:03:50 +0800:
> >
> >> mtd_read() may return -EUCLEAN in case of corrected bit-flips.This
> >> particular condition should not be treated like an error.
> >
> > I'm fine with the patch, Richard, are you okay as well?
>
> Hm yes. I see the bug. I think it broke about 10 years ago
> by e47f68587b82 ("mtd: check for max_bitflips in mtd_read_oob()").
>
> In the early day I'd expect someone to hit this bug but I guess
> on the last 10 years mtdblock had no real users.
Right.
Well, anyhow I guess this patch deserves a Fixes/Cc: stable # v3.7+
Li, can you please re-send with the proper tags? Thanks.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists