[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230329121257.GC11932@green5>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:42:57 +0530
From: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
Cc: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@...sung.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, bvanassche@....org,
hare@...e.de, ming.lei@...hat.com, joshi.k@...sung.com,
nitheshshetty@...il.com, gost.dev@...sung.com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/9] dm: Add support for copy offload.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:59:49PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 3/27/23 17:40, Anuj Gupta wrote:
> > From: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>
> >
>
> Drop the period at the end of the patch title.
Acked
>
> > Before enabling copy for dm target, check if underlying devices and
> > dm target support copy. Avoid split happening inside dm target.
> > Fail early if the request needs split, currently splitting copy
> > request is not supported.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/md/dm-table.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/md/dm.c | 7 ++++++
> > include/linux/device-mapper.h | 5 +++++
> > 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> > index 7899f5fb4c13..45e894b9e3be 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> > @@ -1863,6 +1863,39 @@ static bool dm_table_supports_nowait(struct dm_table *t)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +static int device_not_copy_capable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
> > + sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(dev->bdev);
> > +
> > + return !blk_queue_copy(q);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool dm_table_supports_copy(struct dm_table *t)
> > +{
> > + struct dm_target *ti;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < t->num_targets; i++) {
> > + ti = dm_table_get_target(t, i);
> > +
> > + if (!ti->copy_offload_supported)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * target provides copy support (as implied by setting
> > + * 'copy_offload_supported')
> > + * and it relies on _all_ data devices having copy support.
> > + */
> > + if (!ti->type->iterate_devices ||
> > + ti->type->iterate_devices(ti,
> > + device_not_copy_capable, NULL))
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int device_not_discard_capable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
> > sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
> > {
> > @@ -1945,6 +1978,15 @@ int dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,
> > q->limits.discard_misaligned = 0;
> > }
> >
> > + if (!dm_table_supports_copy(t)) {
> > + blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_COPY, q);
> > + /* Must also clear copy limits... */
>
> Not a useful comment. The code is clear.
Acked
>
> > + q->limits.max_copy_sectors = 0;
> > + q->limits.max_copy_sectors_hw = 0;
> > + } else {
> > + blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_COPY, q);
> > + }
> > +
> > if (!dm_table_supports_secure_erase(t))
> > q->limits.max_secure_erase_sectors = 0;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> > index 2d0f934ba6e6..08ec51000af8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> > @@ -1693,6 +1693,13 @@ static blk_status_t __split_and_process_bio(struct clone_info *ci)
> > if (unlikely(ci->is_abnormal_io))
> > return __process_abnormal_io(ci, ti);
> >
> > + if ((unlikely(op_is_copy(ci->bio->bi_opf)) &&
> > + max_io_len(ti, ci->sector) < ci->sector_count)) {
> > + DMERR("Error, IO size(%u) > max target size(%llu)\n",
> > + ci->sector_count, max_io_len(ti, ci->sector));
> > + return BLK_STS_IOERR;
> > + }
> > +
> > /*
> > * Only support bio polling for normal IO, and the target io is
> > * exactly inside the dm_io instance (verified in dm_poll_dm_io)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/device-mapper.h b/include/linux/device-mapper.h
> > index 7975483816e4..44969a20295e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/device-mapper.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/device-mapper.h
> > @@ -380,6 +380,11 @@ struct dm_target {
> > * bio_set_dev(). NOTE: ideally a target should _not_ need this.
> > */
> > bool needs_bio_set_dev:1;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * copy offload is supported
> > + */
> > + bool copy_offload_supported:1;
> > };
> >
> > void *dm_per_bio_data(struct bio *bio, size_t data_size);
>
> --
> Damien Le Moal
> Western Digital Research
>
>
Thank you,
Nitesh Shetty
Powered by blists - more mailing lists