| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230329122248.GD11932@green5>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:52:48 +0530
From: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
Cc: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@...sung.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, bvanassche@....org,
hare@...e.de, ming.lei@...hat.com, joshi.k@...sung.com,
nitheshshetty@...il.com, gost.dev@...sung.com,
Vincent Fu <vincent.fu@...sung.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 9/9] null_blk: add support for copy offload
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 06:04:49PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 3/27/23 17:40, Anuj Gupta wrote:
> > From: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>
> >
> > Implementaion is based on existing read and write infrastructure.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Fu <vincent.fu@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/block/null_blk/main.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/block/null_blk/null_blk.h | 7 +++
> > 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
> > index 9e6b032c8ecc..84c5fbcd67a5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
> > @@ -1257,6 +1257,81 @@ static int null_transfer(struct nullb *nullb, struct page *page,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline int nullb_setup_copy_read(struct nullb *nullb,
> > + struct bio *bio)
> > +{
> > + struct nullb_copy_token *token = bvec_kmap_local(&bio->bi_io_vec[0]);
> > +
> > + memcpy(token->subsys, "nullb", 5);
> > + token->sector_in = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
> > + token->nullb = nullb;
> > + token->sectors = bio->bi_iter.bi_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int nullb_setup_copy_write(struct nullb *nullb,
> > + struct bio *bio, bool is_fua)
> > +{
> > + struct nullb_copy_token *token = bvec_kmap_local(&bio->bi_io_vec[0]);
> > + sector_t sector_in, sector_out;
> > + void *in, *out;
> > + size_t rem, temp;
> > + unsigned long offset_in, offset_out;
> > + struct nullb_page *t_page_in, *t_page_out;
> > + int ret = -EIO;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(memcmp(token->subsys, "nullb", 5)))
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + if (unlikely(token->nullb != nullb))
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + if (WARN_ON(token->sectors != bio->bi_iter.bi_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT))
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> EOPNOTSUPP is strange. These are EINVAL, no ?.
>
acked, will update in next revision.
> > +
> > + sector_in = token->sector_in;
> > + sector_out = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
> > + rem = token->sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irq(&nullb->lock);
> > + while (rem > 0) {
> > + temp = min_t(size_t, nullb->dev->blocksize, rem);
> > + offset_in = (sector_in & SECTOR_MASK) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > + offset_out = (sector_out & SECTOR_MASK) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + if (null_cache_active(nullb) && !is_fua)
> > + null_make_cache_space(nullb, PAGE_SIZE);
> > +
> > + t_page_in = null_lookup_page(nullb, sector_in, false,
> > + !null_cache_active(nullb));
> > + if (!t_page_in)
> > + goto err;
> > + t_page_out = null_insert_page(nullb, sector_out,
> > + !null_cache_active(nullb) || is_fua);
> > + if (!t_page_out)
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > + in = kmap_local_page(t_page_in->page);
> > + out = kmap_local_page(t_page_out->page);
> > +
> > + memcpy(out + offset_out, in + offset_in, temp);
> > + kunmap_local(out);
> > + kunmap_local(in);
> > + __set_bit(sector_out & SECTOR_MASK, t_page_out->bitmap);
> > +
> > + if (is_fua)
> > + null_free_sector(nullb, sector_out, true);
> > +
> > + rem -= temp;
> > + sector_in += temp >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > + sector_out += temp >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = 0;
> > +err:
> > + spin_unlock_irq(&nullb->lock);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int null_handle_rq(struct nullb_cmd *cmd)
> > {
> > struct request *rq = cmd->rq;
> > @@ -1267,6 +1342,14 @@ static int null_handle_rq(struct nullb_cmd *cmd)
> > struct req_iterator iter;
> > struct bio_vec bvec;
> >
> > + if (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_COPY) {
> > + if (op_is_write(req_op(rq)))
> > + return nullb_setup_copy_write(nullb, rq->bio,
> > + rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FUA);
> > + else
>
> No need for this else.
>
acked
> > + return nullb_setup_copy_read(nullb, rq->bio);
> > + }
> > +
> > spin_lock_irq(&nullb->lock);
> > rq_for_each_segment(bvec, rq, iter) {
> > len = bvec.bv_len;
> > @@ -1294,6 +1377,14 @@ static int null_handle_bio(struct nullb_cmd *cmd)
> > struct bio_vec bvec;
> > struct bvec_iter iter;
> >
> > + if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_COPY) {
> > + if (op_is_write(bio_op(bio)))
> > + return nullb_setup_copy_write(nullb, bio,
> > + bio->bi_opf & REQ_FUA);
> > + else
>
> No need for this else.
>
acked
> > + return nullb_setup_copy_read(nullb, bio);
> > + }
> > +
> > spin_lock_irq(&nullb->lock);
> > bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio, iter) {
> > len = bvec.bv_len;
> > @@ -2146,6 +2237,9 @@ static int null_add_dev(struct nullb_device *dev)
> > list_add_tail(&nullb->list, &nullb_list);
> > mutex_unlock(&lock);
> >
> > + blk_queue_max_copy_sectors_hw(nullb->disk->queue, 1024);
> > + blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_COPY, nullb->disk->queue);
>
> This should NOT be unconditionally enabled with a magic value of 1K sectors. The
> max copy sectors needs to be set with a configfs attribute so that we can
> enable/disable the copy offload support, to be able to exercise both block layer
> emulation and native device support.
>
acked
> > +
> > pr_info("disk %s created\n", nullb->disk_name);
> >
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk/null_blk.h b/drivers/block/null_blk/null_blk.h
> > index eb5972c50be8..94e524e7306a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/null_blk/null_blk.h
> > +++ b/drivers/block/null_blk/null_blk.h
> > @@ -67,6 +67,13 @@ enum {
> > NULL_Q_MQ = 2,
> > };
> >
> > +struct nullb_copy_token {
> > + char subsys[5];
> > + struct nullb *nullb;
> > + u64 sector_in;
> > + u64 sectors;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct nullb_device {
> > struct nullb *nullb;
> > struct config_item item;
>
> --
> Damien Le Moal
> Western Digital Research
>
>
Thank you,
Nitesh Shetty
Powered by blists - more mailing lists