linux-kernel - [PATCH v3] xfs: fix BUG_ON in xfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230329025258.1074860-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:52:58 +0800
From:   Ye Bin <yebin@...weicloud.com>
To:     djwong@...nel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yebin10@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH v3] xfs: fix BUG_ON in xfs_getbmap()

From: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>

There's issue as follows:
XFS: Assertion failed: (bmv->bmv_iflags & BMV_IF_DELALLOC) != 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c, line: 329
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:102!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
CPU: 1 PID: 14612 Comm: xfs_io Not tainted 6.3.0-rc2-next-20230315-00006-g2729d23ddb3b-dirty #422
RIP: 0010:assfail+0x96/0xa0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000fa178c0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffff888179a18000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff888179a18000 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff8321aab6 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed1105f85139 R12: ffffffff8aacc4c0
R13: 0000000000000149 R14: ffff888269f58000 R15: 000000000000000c
FS:  00007f42f27a4740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000b92388 CR3: 000000024f006000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 xfs_getbmap+0x1a5b/0x1e40
 xfs_ioc_getbmap+0x1fd/0x5b0
 xfs_file_ioctl+0x2cb/0x1d50
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happen as follows:
         ThreadA                       ThreadB
do_shared_fault
 __do_fault
  xfs_filemap_fault
   __xfs_filemap_fault
    filemap_fault
                             xfs_ioc_getbmap -> Without BMV_IF_DELALLOC flag
			      xfs_getbmap
			       xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED);
			       filemap_write_and_wait
 do_page_mkwrite
  xfs_filemap_page_mkwrite
   __xfs_filemap_fault
    xfs_ilock(XFS_I(inode), XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED);
    iomap_page_mkwrite
     ...
     xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin
      xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc -> Allocate delay extent
                              xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(ip)
	                      xfs_getbmap_report_one
			       ASSERT((bmv->bmv_iflags & BMV_IF_DELALLOC) != 0)
	                        -> trigger BUG_ON

As xfs_filemap_page_mkwrite() only hold XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED lock, there's
small window mkwrite can produce delay extent after file write in xfs_getbmap().
To solve above issue, just skip delalloc extents.

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
index a09dd2606479..f032d3a4b727 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
@@ -314,15 +314,13 @@ xfs_getbmap_report_one(
 	if (isnullstartblock(got->br_startblock) ||
 	    got->br_startblock == DELAYSTARTBLOCK) {
 		/*
-		 * Delalloc extents that start beyond EOF can occur due to
-		 * speculative EOF allocation when the delalloc extent is larger
-		 * than the largest freespace extent at conversion time.  These
-		 * extents cannot be converted by data writeback, so can exist
-		 * here even if we are not supposed to be finding delalloc
-		 * extents.
+		 * Take the flush completion as being a point-in-time snapshot
+		 * where there are no delalloc extents, and if any new ones
+		 * have been created racily, just skip them as being 'after'
+		 * the flush and so don't get reported.
 		 */
-		if (got->br_startoff < XFS_B_TO_FSB(ip->i_mount, XFS_ISIZE(ip)))
-			ASSERT((bmv->bmv_iflags & BMV_IF_DELALLOC) != 0);
+		if (!(bmv->bmv_iflags & BMV_IF_DELALLOC))
+			return 0;
 
 		p->bmv_oflags |= BMV_OF_DELALLOC;
 		p->bmv_block = -2;
-- 
2.31.1