linux-kernel - [PATCH] sched/numa: Fix divide by zero for sysctl_numa_balancing_scan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230329162610.4130188-1-chris.hyser@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:26:10 -0400
From:   Chris Hyser <chris.hyser@...cle.com>
To:     chris.hyser@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, peterz@...radead.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched/numa: Fix divide by zero for sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size.

From: chris hyser <chris.hyser@...cle.com>

Commit 6419265899d9 ("sched/fair: Fix division by zero
sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size") prevented a divide by zero by using
sysctl mechanisms to return EINVAL for a sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size
value of zero. When moved from a sysctl to a debugfs file, this checking
was lost.

This patch puts zero checking back in place.

Signed-off-by: Chris Hyser <chris.hyser@...cle.com>
---
 kernel/sched/debug.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index 1637b65ba07a..dfd0fe6123ec 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -278,6 +278,54 @@ static const struct file_operations sched_dynamic_fops = {
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
+
+static ssize_t sched_numa_scan_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
+				     size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	char buf[16];
+	unsigned int scan_size;
+
+	if (cnt > 15)
+		cnt = 15;
+
+	if (copy_from_user(&buf, ubuf, cnt))
+		return -EFAULT;
+	buf[cnt] = '\0';
+
+	if (kstrtouint(buf, 10, &scan_size))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!scan_size)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size = scan_size;
+
+	*ppos += cnt;
+	return cnt;
+}
+
+static int sched_numa_scan_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
+{
+	seq_printf(m, "%d\n", sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int sched_numa_scan_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
+{
+	return single_open(filp, sched_numa_scan_show, NULL);
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations sched_numa_scan_fops = {
+	.open		= sched_numa_scan_open,
+	.write		= sched_numa_scan_write,
+	.read		= seq_read,
+	.llseek		= seq_lseek,
+	.release	= single_release,
+};
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
+
 __read_mostly bool sched_debug_verbose;
 
 static const struct seq_operations sched_debug_sops;
@@ -332,7 +380,7 @@ static __init int sched_init_debug(void)
 	debugfs_create_u32("scan_delay_ms", 0644, numa, &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay);
 	debugfs_create_u32("scan_period_min_ms", 0644, numa, &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_min);
 	debugfs_create_u32("scan_period_max_ms", 0644, numa, &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_max);
-	debugfs_create_u32("scan_size_mb", 0644, numa, &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size);
+	debugfs_create_file("scan_size_mb", 0644, numa, NULL, &sched_numa_scan_fops);
 	debugfs_create_u32("hot_threshold_ms", 0644, numa, &sysctl_numa_balancing_hot_threshold);
 #endif
 
-- 
2.31.1