[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8316d69-1aa4-f911-8074-11193d9f1a7c@alu.unizg.hr>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:27:31 +0200
From: Mirsad Goran Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
Cc: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
Subject: Re: [BUG] [BISECTED] [CORRECTION] systemd-devd triggers kernel
memleak apparently in drivers/core/dd.c: driver_register()
On 29.3.2023. 17:46, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> So, the "tlmi_setting" memory leak appears to be fixed by this diff.
>>
>> The next step is to add Armin-suggested patch:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>> index c816646eb661..1e77ecb0cba8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>> @@ -929,8 +929,10 @@ static ssize_t current_value_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *a
>>
>> /* validate and split from `item,value` -> `value` */
>> value = strpbrk(item, ",");
>> - if (!value || value == item || !strlen(value + 1))
>> + if (!value || value == item || !strlen(value + 1)) {
>> + kfree(item);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>>
>> ret = sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", value + 1);
>> kfree(item);
>>
>> and Thomas' correction for the return type of the tlmi_setting() function:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>> index 86b33b74519be..c924e9e4a6a5b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>> @@ -1353,7 +1353,6 @@ static struct tlmi_pwd_setting *tlmi_create_auth(const char *pwd_type,
>>
>> static int tlmi_analyze(void)
>> {
>> - acpi_status status;
>> int i, ret;
>>
>> if (wmi_has_guid(LENOVO_SET_BIOS_SETTINGS_GUID) &&
>> @@ -1390,8 +1389,8 @@ static int tlmi_analyze(void)
>> char *p;
>>
>> tlmi_priv.setting[i] = NULL;
>> - status = tlmi_setting(i, &item, LENOVO_BIOS_SETTING_GUID);
>> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> + ret = tlmi_setting(i, &item, LENOVO_BIOS_SETTING_GUID);
>> + if (ret)
>> break;
>> if (!item)
>> break;
>>
>> A build on top of 6.3-rc4+ fcd476ea6a88 commit is on the way, with all three included.
>
> Good work on catching these issues, thank you all for your work on this.
Not at all. It was a very interesting problem and a great session of brainstorming with
Greg, Armin and Thomas.
> I assume that these fixes will be posted as a proper 3 patch
> patch-series (one patch per fix) once you are done testing?
This is for others to decide. Armin gave a great hint with the one patch, and I sort of
had a race condition of the one with Thomas that was the final fix ;-)
The tlmi_setting return value fix by Thomas is already committed to the for-next tree,
I got it from there.
I do not have any authorship pretensions, this was a collaboration, so I don't know what
is due in the Code of Conduct for such circumstances. I trust you guys will do the right thing.
The 6.3.0-rc4-00034-gfcd476ea6a88 kernel apparently has a stackdump:
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 746 at drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c:879 cooling_device_stats_setup+0xb4/0xc0
but with our without the patch, and it apparently isn't related.
Best regards,
Mirsad
--
Mirsad Todorovac
System engineer
Faculty of Graphic Arts | Academy of Fine Arts
University of Zagreb
Republic of Croatia, the European Union
Sistem inženjer
Grafički fakultet | Akademija likovnih umjetnosti
Sveučilište u Zagrebu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists