lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2023 20:11:22 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
        konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
        quic_plai@...cinc.com, quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com,
        quic_visr@...cinc.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, swboyd@...omium.org
Cc:     Mohammad Rafi Shaik <quic_mohs@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] clk: qcom: lpasscc-sc7280: Remove qdsp6ss clock registration

Quoting Mohammad Rafi Shaik (2023-03-27 09:32:49)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/lpasscc-sc7280.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/lpasscc-sc7280.c
> index 48432010ce24..4719e3fa8b05 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/lpasscc-sc7280.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/lpasscc-sc7280.c
> @@ -121,17 +67,10 @@ static int lpass_cc_sc7280_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 goto destroy_pm_clk;
>         }
>  
> -       lpass_regmap_config.name = "qdsp6ss";
> -       desc = &lpass_qdsp6ss_sc7280_desc;
> -
> -       ret = qcom_cc_probe_by_index(pdev, 0, desc);
> -       if (ret)
> -               goto destroy_pm_clk;
> -
>         lpass_regmap_config.name = "top_cc";
>         desc = &lpass_cc_top_sc7280_desc;
>  
> -       ret = qcom_cc_probe_by_index(pdev, 1, desc);
> +       ret = qcom_cc_probe_by_index(pdev, 0, desc);

Instead of changing the binding, it may be better to leave it as is and
ignore the first reg property in the driver. Then you don't need any DTS
patch or binding patch. You can just have this one patch. After that you
can introduce a new compatible string for the proper design and make it
have only a single reg property and deprecate the old binding. The
driver can then pick index 0 if the new compatible is present.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ