linux-kernel - Re: Panic starting 6.2.x and later 6.1.x kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c99b8e4b-b835-8520-2667-3d7dd2839a3e@unsolicited.net>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 20:31:07 +0100
From:   David R <david@...olicited.net>
To:     "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Gabriel David <ultracoolguy@...root.org>,
        eric.devolder@...cle.com
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kvijayab@....com>
Subject: Re: Panic starting 6.2.x and later 6.1.x kernels

On 29/03/2023 20:24, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> On 3/29/2023 14:20, David R wrote:
>> On 29/03/2023 20:17, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
>>>
>>> You mean specifically this change:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230327191026.3454-2-eric.devolder@oracle.com/ 
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes; I suppose that still makes sense.
>>>
>> Yes, that's the one.
>>
>> But the fact that  that one worked own its own implies that my system 
>> never had the flag set in the first place?
>>
>> David
>
> Right - your BIOS doesn't support MADT revision 5 which was introduced 
> as part of ACPI 6.3.
>
> If you haven't already you should add a Tested-by tag for Eric's patch.
>
> I think both mine and his coupled together should cover both of these 
> possible areas of breakage.

Indeed.

I'm not subscribed to linux-pm so don't know how I'd add my Tested-by:

By all means add it on my behalf.

Cheers
David