linux-kernel - [for-next][PATCH 13/25] tracing/user_events: Track fork/exec/exit for mm lifetime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230329194551.655419033@goodmis.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 15:45:29 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 13/25] tracing/user_events: Track fork/exec/exit for mm lifetime

From: Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>

During tracefs discussions it was decided instead of requiring a mapping
within a user-process to track the lifetime of memory descriptors we
should hook the appropriate calls. Do this by adding the minimal stubs
required for task fork, exec, and exit. Currently this is just a NOP.
Future patches will implement these calls fully.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230328235219.203-3-beaub@linux.microsoft.com

Suggested-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Signed-off-by: Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 fs/exec.c                   |  2 ++
 include/linux/sched.h       |  5 +++++
 include/linux/user_events.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/exit.c               |  2 ++
 kernel/fork.c               |  2 ++
 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 7c44d0c65b1b..2b0042f8deec 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@
 #include <linux/syscall_user_dispatch.h>
 #include <linux/coredump.h>
 #include <linux/time_namespace.h>
+#include <linux/user_events.h>
 
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
@@ -1859,6 +1860,7 @@ static int bprm_execve(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
 	current->fs->in_exec = 0;
 	current->in_execve = 0;
 	rseq_execve(current);
+	user_events_execve(current);
 	acct_update_integrals(current);
 	task_numa_free(current, false);
 	return retval;
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 63d242164b1a..bf37846e90c2 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct sighand_struct;
 struct signal_struct;
 struct task_delay_info;
 struct task_group;
+struct user_event_mm;
 
 /*
  * Task state bitmask. NOTE! These bits are also
@@ -1528,6 +1529,10 @@ struct task_struct {
 	union rv_task_monitor		rv[RV_PER_TASK_MONITORS];
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_USER_EVENTS
+	struct user_event_mm		*user_event_mm;
+#endif
+
 	/*
 	 * New fields for task_struct should be added above here, so that
 	 * they are included in the randomized portion of task_struct.
diff --git a/include/linux/user_events.h b/include/linux/user_events.h
index 13689589d36e..3d747c45d2fa 100644
--- a/include/linux/user_events.h
+++ b/include/linux/user_events.h
@@ -11,4 +11,22 @@
 
 #include <uapi/linux/user_events.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_USER_EVENTS
+struct user_event_mm {
+};
+#endif
+
+static inline void user_events_fork(struct task_struct *t,
+				    unsigned long clone_flags)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void user_events_execve(struct task_struct *t)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void user_events_exit(struct task_struct *t)
+{
+}
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_USER_EVENTS_H */
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index f2afdb0add7c..875d6a134df8 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
 #include <linux/kprobes.h>
 #include <linux/rethook.h>
 #include <linux/sysfs.h>
+#include <linux/user_events.h>
 
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/unistd.h>
@@ -818,6 +819,7 @@ void __noreturn do_exit(long code)
 
 	coredump_task_exit(tsk);
 	ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT, code);
+	user_events_exit(tsk);
 
 	validate_creds_for_do_exit(tsk);
 
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index d8cda4c6de6c..efb1f2257772 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
 #include <linux/io_uring.h>
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
 #include <linux/stackprotector.h>
+#include <linux/user_events.h>
 
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
@@ -2505,6 +2506,7 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
 
 	trace_task_newtask(p, clone_flags);
 	uprobe_copy_process(p, clone_flags);
+	user_events_fork(p, clone_flags);
 
 	copy_oom_score_adj(clone_flags, p);
 
-- 
2.39.1