linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add the clock stretching i2c property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2023 01:51:08 +0200
From:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
        Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add the clock stretching i2c property

Hi Wolfram,

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 09:06:43PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > The DTS schema has been applied in commit c83dd2cb836e ("schemas:
> > i2c: Add the clock stretching property").
> 
> Everyone, A general remark: If bindings for the dtschema are added,
> please include the linux-i2c mailing list. This binding is OK, but it
> would be good to have the discussion also here for additional input.

Thanks for letting me know. It's actually my mistake, as I didn't
check how to properly distribute the patch to all relevant
parties.

Regarding dtschema patches, they are typically submitted as
GitHub pull requests. How should I send it to the linux-i2c?
Should I also send it to the mailing list like any other patch?
(This might make the code review process somewhat confusing,
though).

Thanks,
Andi