linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/7] module: move finished

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230329053149.3976378-2-mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2023 22:31:43 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     david@...hat.com, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pmladek@...e.com,
        petr.pavlu@...e.com, prarit@...hat.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        rafael@...nel.org
Cc:     christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, tglx@...utronix.de,
        peterz@...radead.org, song@...nel.org, rppt@...nel.org,
        willy@...radead.org, vbabka@...e.cz, mhocko@...e.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mcgrof@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] module: move finished_loading()

This has no functional change, just moves a routine earlier
as we'll make use of it next.

Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/module/main.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
index 5cc21083af04..af58e63e5daf 100644
--- a/kernel/module/main.c
+++ b/kernel/module/main.c
@@ -2442,27 +2442,6 @@ static int post_relocation(struct module *mod, const struct load_info *info)
 	return module_finalize(info->hdr, info->sechdrs, mod);
 }
 
-/* Is this module of this name done loading?  No locks held. */
-static bool finished_loading(const char *name)
-{
-	struct module *mod;
-	bool ret;
-
-	/*
-	 * The module_mutex should not be a heavily contended lock;
-	 * if we get the occasional sleep here, we'll go an extra iteration
-	 * in the wait_event_interruptible(), which is harmless.
-	 */
-	sched_annotate_sleep();
-	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
-	mod = find_module_all(name, strlen(name), true);
-	ret = !mod || mod->state == MODULE_STATE_LIVE
-		|| mod->state == MODULE_STATE_GOING;
-	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
 /* Call module constructors. */
 static void do_mod_ctors(struct module *mod)
 {
@@ -2626,6 +2605,27 @@ static int may_init_module(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/* Is this module of this name done loading?  No locks held. */
+static bool finished_loading(const char *name)
+{
+	struct module *mod;
+	bool ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * The module_mutex should not be a heavily contended lock;
+	 * if we get the occasional sleep here, we'll go an extra iteration
+	 * in the wait_event_interruptible(), which is harmless.
+	 */
+	sched_annotate_sleep();
+	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
+	mod = find_module_all(name, strlen(name), true);
+	ret = !mod || mod->state == MODULE_STATE_LIVE
+		|| mod->state == MODULE_STATE_GOING;
+	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * We try to place it in the list now to make sure it's unique before
  * we dedicate too many resources.  In particular, temporary percpu
-- 
2.39.2